La técnica de impresiones en cubeta abierta con malla de sílice-nylon para ferulización de implantes: reporte de caso clínico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21270/archi.v10i7.5301Palabras clave:
Implantes Dentales, Prótesis Dental, Nylons, Simulación por ComputadorResumen
Este estudio describe una técnica alternativa de cubeta abierta para impresiones de implantes utilizando una nueva malla de sílice-nylon cubierta con resina acrílica como un sistema de ferulización en montaje del complejo de pilares. El objetivo del procedimiento es simplificar la técnica y mejorar la contracción de la resina durante el procedimiento clínico y también optimiza y reduce el tiempo de atención al paciente. El relato clínico fue respaldado por un estudio in vitro en el que se utilizó una herramienta de análisis, Análisis de Galgas Extensométricas, para probar la efectividad clínica de la técnica. La deformación periimplantaria se determinó en moldes de poliuretano con la prótesis apretada, y estadísticamente no hubo diferencia en la deformación del torque de los postes o en la prótesis final. La malla de nylon unida a la resina acrílica representa una opción prometedora para la técnica de impresión en cubeta abierta, creando una unión resistente para transferir en un excelente tiempo de procedimiento.
Descargas
Citas
Freitas RF, Dias KC, Carreiro AFP, Barbosa GA, Ferreira MA. Mandibular Implant-supported removable partial denture with distal extension: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39:791-98.
Craddock HL. Consequences of tooth loss (part 1): The patient perspective—aesthetic and functional implications. Sadj. 2010;65:242-45.
Craddock HL. Consequences of tooth loss (part 2): dentist considerations—restorative problems and implications. Sadj. 2010;65:292-96.
Flanagan D. Avoiding osseous grafting in the atrophic posterior mandible for implant-supported fixed partial dentures: a report of 2 cases. J Oral Implantol. 2011;37:705-11.
Kisely S, Baghaie H, Lallo R, Siskind D, Johnson NW. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between poor oral health and severe mental illness. Psychosom Med. 2015;77:83-92.
Jin LJ, Lamster I, Greenspan JS, Pitts N, Scully C, Warnakulasuriya S. Global Burden of oral diseases: emerging concepts, management and interplay with systemic health. Oral Dis. 2016;22(7):609-19.
Kumar Y, Chand P, Arova V, Singh Sv, Mishra N, Alvi HA, Verma UP. Comparison of rehabilitating missing mandibular first molars with implant or tooth-supported prostheses using masticatory efficiency and patient satisfaction outcomes. J Prosthodont. 2017;26:376-80.
Cerqueira NM, Ozcan M, Gonçalves M, da Rocha DM, Vasconcellos DK, Bottino MA, Yener-Salihoğlu E. A strain gauge analysis of microstrain induced by various splinting methods and acrylic resin types for implant impressions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:341-45.
Revilla-León M, Sánchez-Rubio JL, Oteo-Calatayud J, Özcan M. Impression technique for a complete-arch prosthesis with multiple implants using additive manufacturing technologies. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:714-20.
Alqahtani F. Marginal fit of all-ceramic crowns fabricated using two extraoral CAD/CAM systems in comparison with the conventional technique. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2017;16:13-8.
Papaspyridakos P, Hirayama H, Chen CJ, Ho CH, Chronopoulos V, Weber HP. Full-arch implant fixed prostheses: a comparative study on the effect of connection type and impression technique on accuracy of fit. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:1099-105.
Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ, Alfano SG, Cacovean JN, Balshi SF. Fabricating an Accurate Implant Master Cast: A Technique Report. J Prosthodont. 2015;24:654-60.
Gayathridevi SK, Gowda H, Vaishali K, Suma. Impression Techniques in Implants. J Dent Orofac Res. 2016;12:11-9.
Del'Acqua MA, Chávez AM, Compagnoni MA, Molo Fde A Jr. Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:715-21.
Norman C, Michael Klein, Simons A. Atlas of Oral Implantology. Second Edition. St Louis, Mo: Mosby Year Book; 1999.
Lee SJ, Cho SB. Accuracy of five implant impression technique: effect of splinting materials and methods. J Adv Prosthodont. 2011;3:177-85.
Almeida CS, Amaral M, Gonçalves FCP, Paes-Junior TJA. Effect of an experimental silica-nylon reinforcement on the fracture load and flexural strength of bisacrylic interim partial fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:301-5.
Gonçalves FCP, Amaral M, Borges ALS, Gonçalves LFM, Paes-Junior TJA. Fracture load of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with nylon-silica mesh: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;119:606-10.
Wegner K, Weskott K, Zenginel M, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. Effects of implant system, impression technique, and impression material on accuracy of the working cast. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:989-95.
Alikhasi M, Siadat H, Beyabanaki E, Kharazifard MJ. Accuracy of implant position transfer and surface detail reproduction with different impression materials and techniques. J Dent (Tehran). 2015;12:774-83.
Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Penkner K, Polansky R, Sedaj B, Wegscheider WA. Comparison of the transfer precision of three different impression materials in combination with transfer caps for the Frialit-2 system. Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:629-38.
Selvaraj S, Dorairaj J, Mohan J, Simon P. Comparison of implant cast accuracy of multiple implant impression technique with different splinting materials: An in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016;16:167-75.
Moreira AH, Rodrigues NF, Pinho AC, Fonseca JC, Vilaça JL. Accuracy comparison of implant impression techniques: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:751-64.
Zen BM, Soares EF, Rodrigues MA, Luthi LF, Consani RL, Mesquita MF, Henriques GE. Comparison of the accuracy of different transfer impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Oral Implantol. 2015;41:662-7.
Gennari Filho H, Mazaro JV, Vedovatto E, Assunção WG, dos Santos PH. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques. J Prosthodont. 2009;18:172-6.
Ongül D, Gökçen-Röhlig B, Şermet B, Keskin H. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of different direct impression techniques for multiple implants. Aust Dent J. 2012;57:184-9.
Siadat H, Alikhasi M, Beyabanaki E, Rahimian S. Comparison of different impression techniques when using the all-on-four implant treatment protocol. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29:265-70.
Chen XY, Zhang CY, Nie EM, Zhang MC. Treatment planning of implants when 3 mandibular posterior teeth are missing: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Implant Dent. 2012;21:340-3.
Karl M, Holst S. Strain development of screw-retained implant-supported fixed restorations: procera implant bridge versus conventionally cast restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25:166-9.
Waskewicz GA, Ostrowski JS, Parks VJ. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution transmitted from a fixed prosthesis attached to osseointegrated implants. Braz Oral Res. 2004;18:45-52.
