Influence of Restorative Material on the Longevity of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Endocrowns: an Integrative Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21270/archi.v14i1.6272Keywords:
Dental Materials, Ceramics, LongevityAbstract
The objective of this integrative literature review was to analyze the influence of restorative material on the longevity of endodontically treated teeth restored with endocrowns. The literature review was based on the PICO strategy, where searches were conducted in the Pubmed, Science Direct, and VHL databases using the search strategy: ("endodontically treated teeth") AND ("endocrowns" OR "endocrown restoration" OR "no-post buildup" OR "adhesive endodontic crowns" OR "endocrown") AND ("dental materials"). Inclusion criteria were In Vivo, In Vitro, or In Silico studies that observed stress concentration, fracture resistance, and dental fracture patterns. Exclusion criteria included studies on intraradicular retainers, studies that did not include materials as variables, articles on temporary materials, literature reviews, clinical cases, and opinion articles. Eight studies were selected through the search strategy, including five In Vitro and three In Silico studies. The selected articles had their data compiled into tables, and duplicates were counted only once. Restorative material influences the longevity of endodontically treated teeth restored with endocrown. Factors such as restoration depth, the amount of remaining coronal structure, and internal surface treatment of the restoration appear to interfere with the longevity of restorations and the dental fracture pattern.
Downloads
References
Figueiredo V, Costa Neto JL, Souza JGA, Barreto KA. Longevidade de dentes tratados endodonticamente e restaurados com pinos metálicos e de fibra de vidro: uma revisão integrativa da literatura. J Dent Public Health. 2021;12(1):61-70.
Rocca GT, Saratti CM, Poncet A, Feilzer AJ, Krejci I. The influence of FRCs reinforcement on marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM composite resin endocrowns after simulated fatigue loading. Odontology. 2016;104(2):220-32.
Sedrez-Porto JA, Rosa WL, da Silva AF, Münchow EA, Pereira-Cenci T. Endocrown restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;52:8-14.
Pedrollo Lise D, Van Ende A, De Munck J, Umeda Suzuki TY, Cardoso Vieira LC, Van Meerbeek B. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars using different preparation designs and CAD/CAM materials. J Dent. 2017;59:54-61.
Caldas RA, Bacchi A, Barão VAR, Versluis A. Should adhesive debonding be simulated for intra-radicular post stress analyses? Dent Mater. 2018;34(9):1331-1341.
da Fonseca GF, de Andrade GS, Dal Piva AMO, Tribst JPM, Borges ALS. Computer-aided design finite element modeling of different approaches to rehabilitate endodontically treated teeth. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018;18(4):329-335.
Sedrez-Porto JA, Münchow EA, Valente LL, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. New material perspective for endocrown restorations: effects on mechanical performance and fracture behavior. Braz Oral Res. 2019;33:e012.
Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, de Jager N, Bottino MA, de Kok P, Kleverlaan CJ. Full-Crown Versus Endocrown Approach: A 3D-Analysis of Both Restorations and the Effect of Ferrule and Restoration Material. J Prosthodont. 2021;30(4):335-344.
Bettencourt MVM, Ismerim AB, Lima EMCX, Carvalho AO. Restaurações endocrown: uma revisão de literatura. J Dent Public Health. 2021;12(2)104.
Biacchi GR, Mello B, Basting RT. The endocrown: an alternative approach for restoring extensively damaged molars. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25(6):383-90.
Baratieri LN, Monteiro JS. Odontologia Restauradora - Fundamentos e Possibilidades. 2. ed. São Paulo: Santos Editora, 2015.
Skalskyi V, Makeev V, Stankevych O, Pavlychko R. Features of fracture of prosthetic tooth-endocrown constructions by means of acoustic emission analysis. Dent Mater. 2018;34(3):e46-e55.
El Ghoul WA, Özcan M, Ounsi H, Tohme H, Salameh Z. Effect of different CAD-CAM materials on the marginal and internal adaptation of endocrown restorations: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(1):128-134.
Tribst JP, Dal Piva AO, Madruga CF, Valera MC, Bresciani E, Bottino MA, de Melo RM. The impact of restorative material and ceramic thickness on CADCAM endocrowns. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11(11):e969-e977.
Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28(3):227-35.
Zhu J, Rong Q, Wang X, Gao X. Influence of remaining tooth structure and restorative material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: A finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(5):646-655.
Kanat-Ertürk B, Saridağ S, Köseler E, Helvacioğlu-Yiğit D, Avcu E, Yildiran-Avcu Y. Fracture strengths of endocrown restorations fabricated with different preparation depths and CAD/CAM materials. Dent Mater J. 2018;37(2):256-265.
Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Madruga CFL, Valera MC, Borges ALS, Bresciani E, de Melo RM. Endocrown restorations: Influence of dental remnant and restorative material on stress distribution. Dent Mater. 2018;34(10):1466-1473.
Elashmawy Y, Elshahawy W, Seddik M, Aboushelib M. Influence of fatigue loading on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with endocrowns. J Prosthodont Res. 2021;65(1):78-85.
Santos CMDC, Pimenta CADM, Nobre MRC. A estratégia PICO para a construção da pergunta de pesquisa e busca de evidências. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2007;15 (3):508-511.
Demathé A, Silva ARDS, Carli JP, Goiato MC, Miyahara GI. Odontologia baseada em evidências: otimizando a prática e a pesquisa. RFO UPF. 2012;17(1):96-100.
Borgia Botto E, Barón R, Borgia JL. Endocrown: Endocrowns: A retrospective patient series study, in an 8-to-19-year period. Odontoestomatología. 2016;18(28):48-59.
