Técnicas utilizadas para realizar dispositivos protésicos convencionales con mucosoportado
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21270/archi.v10i6.5010Palabras clave:
Prótesis Dental, Dentadura Completa, Rehabilitación BucalResumen
La rehabilitación protésica es extremadamente importante para el equilibrio emocional y social de los pacientes desdentados. Este tipo de rehabilitación tiene como objetivo permitir el desarrollo satisfactorio de actividades funcionales relacionadas con el sistema estomatognático, como la fonación y la masticación, y ofrecer comodidad y una apariencia estética aceptable. Para lograr el éxito en el tratamiento es necesario un completo diagnóstico y planificación de las fases clínicas y de laboratorio, junto con las expectativas del paciente. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo revisar en la literatura la base científica para la realización de prótesis completas de manera convencional, siguiendo una secuencia estandarizada de todas las fases clínicas y de laboratorio, y de manera simplificada, no realizando algunos pasos sin interferir con el resultado, con el fin de reducir los costos del tratamiento. y tiempo. Se concluye que ambas técnicas brindan buena calidad y tienen un desempeño similar en relación a la masticación y la satisfacción del paciente.
Descargas
Citas
Cristiano DP, Collodel A, Ceretta LB, Simões PW, Ceretta RA, Sonego FGF. Avaliação do desempenho e satisfação dos usuários de próteses totais Mucossuportadas fornecidas pelo Sistema Único de Saúde em município Catarinense. Rev Odontol Univ Cid São Paulo 2018;30(2)116-31.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. SB Brasil 2010: pesquisa nacional de saúde bucal: Resultados principais. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2012.
Vecchia MP, Regis RR, Cunha TR, De Andrade IM, Da Matta JC, De Souza RF: A randomized trial on simplified and conventional methods for Complete denture fabrication: cost analysis. J Prosthodont. 2014;23(3):182-91.
Cunha TR, Della Vecchia MP, Regis RR, Ribeiro AB, Muglia VA, Mestriner W. A randomized trial on simplified and conventional methods For complete denture fabrication: masticatory performance and ability. J Prosthet Dent 2013;41:133-42.
Carlsson GE. Critical review of some dogmas in prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res. 2009; 53(1):3-10.
Regis RR, Alves CC, Rocha SS, Negreiros WA, Freitas-Pontes KM. The importance of a two-step impression procedure for complete denture Fabrication: a systematic review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil. 2016.
Hickey JC, Henderson D, Straus R. Patient response to variations in Denture technique. I. Design of a study. J Prosthet Dent. 1969;22(2):158-70.
Ellinger CW, Somes GW, Nicol BR, Unger JW, Wesley RC. Patient Response to variations in denture technique. Part III: Five-year subjective Evaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;42(2):127-30.
Duncan JP, Taylor TD. Teaching an abbreviated impression technique for complete dentures in an undergraduate dental curriculum. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(2):121-25.
Clark RK, Radford DR, Fenlon MR. The future of teaching of complete Denture construction to undergraduates in the UK: is a replacement denture technique the answer? Br Dent J. 2004;196(9):571-75.
Kawai Y, Murakami H, Shariati B, Klemetti E, Blomfield JV, Billette L, Do traditional techniques produce better conventional Complete dentures than simplified techniques? J Dent.2005;33(8):659-68.
Nuñez MC, Silva DC, Barcelos BA, Leles CR. Patient satisfaction and Oral health-related quality of life after treatment with traditional and simplified Protocols for complete denture construction.Gerodontology.2015;32(4):247-53.
Jo A, Kanazawa M, Sato Y, Iwaki M, Akiba N, Minakuchi S. A randomized controlled controlled trial of the different impression methods for the complete denture fabrication: Patient reported outcomes. J Dent. 2015; 43(8):989-96.
Ye Y, Sun J. Simplified Complete Denture: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(4):267-74.
Omar R, Al-tarakemah Y, Akbar J, Al-Awadhi S, Behbehani Y, Lamontagne P. Influence of procedural variations during the laboratory Phase of complete denture fabrication on patient satisfaction and denture quality. J Dent. 2013;41(10):852-60.
Regis RR, Cunha TR, Della Vecchia MP, Ribeiro AB, silva-lovato ch, de souza rf. A randomised trial of a simplified method for Complete denture fabrication: patient perception and quality. J Oral Rehabil. 2013; 40(7):535-45.
Souza RF, Leles CR, Compagnoni MA. A survey of complete denture Teaching in Brazilian dental schools. Pos-Grad Rev Fac Odontol. 2002;5(1):5-11.
Owen CP: Guidelines for a minimum acceptable protocol for the construction of Complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19(5):467-74.
OA, Kanazawa M, Sato Y, Iwaki M, Akiba N, Minakuchi S. A Randomized controlled controlled trial of the different impression methods for the Complete denture fabrication: Patient reported outcomes. J Dent. 2015; 43(8):989-96.
Reis, JMSN. Moldagem em prótese total: uma revisão da literatura. RFO POA. 2007;12(1):70-4.
Rashedi B, Petropoulos VC. Preclinical complete dentures curriculum survey. J Prosthodont. 2003;12(1):37-46.
Roessler DM. Complete denture success for patients and dentists. Int Dent J.2003;53:340-5.
